Organisation Capability Assessment
A CAPABILITY REVIEW PROCESS AND CAPACITY BUILDING USING A FEEDBACK-BASED APPROACH
CAPABILITY DEFINED: Government leadership with the ability to formulate strategy and policies that are robust across future conditions (scenarios) and perform service delivery on time, on budget and on quality (fit for purpose).
LEADERSHIP
- Organisational learning – learning limitations; distrust, arrogance, exceptionalism, equality of outcomes ideology
- Servant leadership as the preferred style of leadership
- Change competence (building infrastructure for leading disruptive discontinuities)
- Merit and openness in all decisions
- Setting direction-determining priorities
- Infrastructure for a regular strategic conversation, leadership and engagement of the whole organisation (strategic conversation of the whole organisation in the strategy, leadership and engagement forum)
- Maintaining momentum and focus
- Building trust
- Motivating people (using Herzberg’s true motivators)
- Developing people using personal development planning (PDP) as part of the performance contract
- Taking a leadership stand.
3.1 Scenario-based strategy
City executives need to have a planning time horizon of 20–25 years to anticipate discontinuities in the contextual environment. This relatively long time horizon reflects the time span of discretion, the length of time that it takes for a decision at director level to be seen as correct. A shorter planning time horizon will result in decisions that do not fit with the organisational context 25 years hence. Scenario-based strategy was developed by its founders to do precisely that – enable thinking that is comprehensive and which provides insights into the future that are novel compared to commonly held assumptions about the future. Modelling using the SD methodology is applied to develop a causal loop diagram which reflects the critical causal relationships within specific dynamics. SD models complement scenarios and assist in forming an idea of the future organisational context. SD modelling can support decision makers to penetrate this planning time horizon. A systemic study can also eliminate unintended consequences following policy decisions. Stress-testing strategic priorities for robustness across well-researched scenarios will remove most unintended consequences of the risks that surface during the stress-testing process, aka wind-tunnelling.
Scenario-based strategy tests strategy across the scenarios for robust-ness beforecommitting resources to the plans. Evidence-based choices are preferred as they prevent plans and strategies which are not proven, based on outcomes, from being put in place.
The unfortunate truth is that policymakers formulate policy based on their intentions while citizens judge a policy by the results it delivers in their day-to-day lives. The foundation of policy and politics has to be economics. Unless policy is based on evidence-based economic sense, it should not be adopted.
Collaborating and building common purpose provides an anchor and true north for policy implementation. The national shared vision is usually contained in the agreed national or federal constitution, and for cities and towns the law can be found in the legislation guiding city and town government.
3.2 Service delivery
Service delivery best practice closely follows the industrial principles for customer-centric industrial strategy. Total Quality Control (TQC), Kaizen, Six Sigma and Total Productivity and Quality (TPQ) are similar proven methodologies. These are used for mobilising every ounce of organisational intelligence in the service of eliminating all forms of wastage, working smarter to reduce costs, and the continuous innovative improvement of quality of products and services.
The key to raising productivity and quality is in routine goal setting and review processes which create a line-of-sight connection to the purpose and desired results (vision) of the organisation followed by accountability for delivering on agreed commitments. Shared commitment and sound delivery models ensure that all significant people are involved and proven delivery models are used based on evidence and benchmarks from other settings. A back-to-basics approach and value-for-money services can be achieved through an approach of competitive merit-based bidding and tenders for external suppliers.
Embedding carefully structured organisational routines aligned with the overall corporate strategy is the preferred method of ensuring a sustainable service delivery culture. There are emergent rights-based alternative delivery structures suitable for specific applications and constituencies where rights are important, such as youth engagement in delivery and educational interventions. The Sustainable Community Investment Programme (SCIP) model has economics as a basis.
4 CAPABILITY REVIEW PROCESS – SELF-ASSESSMENT
A self-assessment checklist follows below:
Guideline: Capability assessment may best be done by executive leadership and executive management. Informal leadership may also participate to provide a perspective from the middle levels in the organisation. Select a colleague whose opinions and judgement you trust. Complete the checklist independently and then compare and have a skilful conversation to reach an agreement and proposed action in high leverage areas to shift scores. This checklist may also be completed amongst
Organisation Capability Assessment